Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Daw v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2012] FCA 705 Citation: Daw v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2012] FCA 705
Appeal from: [2012] AATA 70
Parties: ACHEN DAW v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 240 of 2012
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 5 July 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – sole ground being denial of procedural fairness for Tribunal's refusal to grant adjournment sought to accommodate legal representative's wish for further time to prepare applicant's case for hearing – consideration of statutory scheme in respect of decision to be made and other relevant facts Held: No denial of procedural fairness; appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 500, 501 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 39, 43
Cases cited: Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 32 applied Weti v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1531 followed Russell v Duke of Norfolk [1949] 1 All ER 109 followed Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs & Anor; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57 followed Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 followed Goldie v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 111 FCR 378 applied White v Hall (1983) ASC 56-247 referred to Nguyen v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 101 FCR 20 referred to Warrell v Fair Work Australia [2012] FCA 267 distinguished Hutley v Meigan [1996] NSWSC 636 distinguished Hodgkinson v Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board (1994) 50 FCR 504 distinguished
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate