Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Construction, Forestry , Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 707 Citation: Construction, Forestry , Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 707
Parties: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION v BHP COAL PTY LTD
File number: QUD 248 of 2012
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 2 July 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Notice to Produce – Whether notice complies with Rules of Court – Whether notice seeks discovery.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N
Cases cited: Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Emergency Transport Technology Pty Ltd (2011) 277 ALR 388 Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd v State Pollution Control Commission (1991) 25 NSWLR 118 CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd (1992) 37 FCR 1 Trade Practices Commission v Abbco Ice Works Pty Ltd (1994) 52 FCR 96
Date of hearing: 2 July 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr E White
Solicitor for the Applicant: Hall Payne Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr I Neil SC with Mr AW Duffy
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ashurst Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 248 of 2012
BETWEEN: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
Applicant
AND: BHP COAL PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: JESSUP J DATE OF ORDER: 2 JULY 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate