Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Agius v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 714 Citation: Agius v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 714
Parties: GARTH AGIUS AND OTHERS v STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
File number: SAD 6001 of 2000
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 5 July 2012
Date of hearing: 2 July 2012
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Applicants: T Campbell
Solicitor for the Applicants: Campbell Law
Counsel for the State of South Australia: S Avey and A Jantke
Solicitor for the State of South Australia: Crown Solicitor
Counsel for M Millison: Mr Millison attended in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 6001 of 2000
BETWEEN: GARTH AGIUS AND OTHERS
Applicant
AND: STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 5 JULY 2012 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The interlocutory application by Milan Millison and Linda Millison of 7 September 2011 be refused. 2. Unless Milan Millison and Linda Millison file and serve within 28 days a notice of their intention to remain as parties to the application, they be removed as parties to the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 6001 of 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate