Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Paul's Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCA 724 Citation: Paul's Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCA 724
Parties: PAUL'S RETAIL PTY LTD (ACN 114 419 242) and PW INVENTORY PTY LTD (ACN 128 572 341) v LONSDALE AUSTRALIA LIMITED
File number: VID 436 of 2012
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 4 July 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – whether hearing of appeal should be expedited
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth)
Cases cited: British American Tobacco Australia v Secretary, Department of Health & Ageing [2011] FCA 718 considered Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Radisich [2010] FCA 100 considered Johnstone v Cameron [2002] FCAFC 251 considered Decor Corporation Industries Inc v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 655; (1991) 33 FCR 397 applied Lonsdale Australia Ltd v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 584 cited Luck v University of Southern Queensland (2009) 1796 FCR 268 approved Welsh v Digilin Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 78 considered
Date of hearing: 4 July 2012
Date of publication of reasons: 6 July 2012
Date of last submissions: 4 July 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate