Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Plastec Australia Pty Ltd v Plumbing Solutions and Services Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2012] FCA 730 Citation: Plastec Australia Pty Ltd v Plumbing Solutions Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2012] FCA 730
Parties: PLASTEC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 093 513 467 v PLUMBING SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 128 873 629, TONY GREGORY PURDON and RALPH T MARTIN
File number: QUD 272 of 2009
Judge: GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 3 July 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of the disposition of the costs of the principal proceeding
Date of hearing: 3 July 2012
Date of last submissions: 3 July 2012
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C Johnstone
Solicitor for the Applicant: Bennett & Philp Lawyers
Counsel for the Third Respondent: Third Respondent appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 272 of 2009
BETWEEN: PLASTEC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 093 513 467
Applicant
AND: PLUMBING SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES PTY LTD
ACN 128 873 629
First Respondent
TONY GREGORY PURDON
Second Respondent
RALPH T MARTIN
Third Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J DATE OF ORDER: 3 JULY 2012 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The third respondent pay the applicants' costs of and incidental to the proceeding on an indemnity basis. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate