Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Meaden v Bell Potter Securities Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 739 Citation: Meaden v Bell Potter Securities Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 739
Parties: JILLIAN ANNETTA MEADEN v BELL POTTER SECURITIES LIMITED ACN 006 390 772
File number: NSD 670 of 2012
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 8 June 2012
Legislation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 12DA Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1041H Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33N
Cases cited: Meaden v Bell Potter Securities Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 418
Date of hearing: 8 June 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the applicant: AJ Sullivan QC, CD Freeman, F Maher
Solicitor for the applicant: Slater & Gordon
Counsel for the respondent: MJ Leeming SC, JAC Potts
Solicitor for the respondent: Speed & Stracey
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 670 of 2012
BETWEEN: JILLIAN ANNETTA MEADEN
Applicant
AND: BELL POTTER SECURITIES LIMITED ACN 006 390 772
Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 8 JUNE 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal filed on 11 May 2012 be refused. 2. The applicant for leave to appeal pay the respondent's costs of the application for leave. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 670 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate