Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 754 Citation: Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 754
Parties: AUSTRALIAN EXECUTOR TRUSTEES LIMITED v PROVIDENT CAPITAL LIMITED
File number: NSD 808 of 2012
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 3 July 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – stay – principles applying to grant of a stay
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 283HB(1), 283HB(1)(c), 283HB(1)(d), 283HB(2)(c)
Cases cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corp Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 applied Australian Trustee Executors Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd [2012] FCA 728 referred to Australian Workers' Union v Pilkington (Aust) Ltd (2000) 101 FCR 35 applied Commonwealth v McCormack (1984) 155 CLR 273 applied Paringa Mining & Exploration Co plc v North Flinders Mines Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 452 applied Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd v Elderslie Finance Corporation Ltd [2008] FCA 1068 applied Philip Morris (Aust) Ltd v Nixon [1999] FCA 1281 applied
Date of hearing: 3 July 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr A W Street SC with Mr J Hynes
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Henry Davis York
Counsel for the Defendant: Mr P Brereton with Ms B Nolan
Solicitor for the Defendant: Baker & McKenzie
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 808 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate