Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gashi v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2012] FCA 758 Citation: Gashi v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2012] FCA 758
Parties: RASIM GASHI v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION and MANUELA GASHI V COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File numbers: VID 972 of 2010 VID 973 of 2010
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 16 July 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – Taxation appeal – Taxpayer obliged to establish actual level of own income – No adequate disclosure until evidence filed in case – Whether taxpayer, when successful on appeal, should be denied costs in respect of period before disclosure.
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 11 July 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: Dr N Orow with Mr G Parncutt
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kiatos & Co
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P G Sest with Mr E F Wheelahan
Solicitor for the Respondent: Maddocks Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 972 of 2010
BETWEEN: RASIM GASHI
Applicant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE: JESSUP J DATE OF ORDER: 16 JULY 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 973 of 2010
BETWEEN: MANUELA GASHI
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate