Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mantra IP Pty Ltd v Spagnuolo [2012] FCA 769 Citation: Mantra IP Pty Ltd v Spagnuolo [2012] FCA 769
Appeal from: Danilo Spagnuolo v Mantra IP Pty Ltd [2010] ATMO 110
Parties: MANTRA IP PTY LTD ACN 129 980 981 v DANILO SPAGNUOLO AND REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
File number: QUD 505 of 2010
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2012
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – appeal from a decision of a delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks under s 56 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – consideration of whether a word mark is capable of distinguishing designated services from the services of others – consideration of whether a word mark is inherently adapted to distinguish designated services – effect of use of the word mark by appellant and predecessors in title TRADE MARKS – consideration of whether a word mark connotes an iconic building or geographical location such that its use in respect of the designated services would be likely to deceive or cause confusion TRADE MARKS – trade mark not to be registered if use of trade mark would be contrary to law – consideration of whether the use of a word mark would be contrary to s 18 Australian Consumer Law in that it would be likely to mislead or deceive TRADE MARKS – consideration of whether appellant is the owner of a word mark under s 58 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) TRADE MARKS – onus of proof in the determinations required under s 41 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – effect of the presumption of registrability in s 33 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – reconciliation of presumption of registrability and steps under s 41 in an appeal under s 56 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate