Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Binetter v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 4) [2012] FCA 776 Citation: Binetter v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 4) [2012] FCA 776
Parties: MARGARET BINETTER v DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: NSD 420 of 2012
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 20 July 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – applicant's application for costs of successful application for interlocutory injunction where applicant unsuccessful at final hearing
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 40.04
Cases cited: Binetter v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 377 Binetter v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) [2012] FCA 704
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 19 July 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms RL Seiden with Mr P Bruckner
Solicitor for the Applicant: Signet Lawyers Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr MA Wigney SC with Ms KC Morgan
Solicitor for the Respondent Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 420 of 2012
BETWEEN: MARGARET BINETTER
Applicant
AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 20 JULY 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the applicant's interlocutory application filed on 16 March 2012. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate