Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 778 Citation: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 778
Parties: AUSTRALIAN MUD COMPANY PTY LTD (ACN 009 283 416), IMDEX LIMITED (ACN 008 947 813) and REFLEX INSTRUMENTS ASIA PACIFIC PTY LTD (ACN 124 204 191) v CORETELL PTY LTD (ACN 119 188 493) and MINCREST HOLDINGS PTY LTD (TRADING AS CAMTEQ INSTRUMENT SERVICES) (ACN 068 672 471)
File number: WAD 132 of 2007
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 20 July 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – confidentiality regime – discovery
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 20.11, R 20.14(1)(a)
Cases cited: Dennis v Chambers Investment Planners Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 63; (2012) 201 FCR 321
Date of hearing: 17 July 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr C Dimitriadis
Solicitor for the Applicants: Gilbert + Tobin
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr B Hess SC and Dr L Duncan
Solicitor for the Respondents: Arns and Associates
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 132 of 2007
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN MUD COMPANY PTY LTD (ACN 009 283 416)
First Applicant
IMDEX LIMITED (ACN 008 947 813)
Second Applicant
REFLEX INSTRUMENTS ASIA PACIFIC PTY LTD (ACN 124 204 191)
Third Applicant
AND: CORETELL PTY LTD (ACN 119 188 493)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate