Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dennis v Chambers Investment Planners Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 780 Citation: Dennis v Chambers Investment Planners Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 780
Parties: JOHN STRICKLAND DENNIS v CHAMBERS INVESTMENT PLANNERS PTY LTD (ACN 009 294 606) and GEORGE KAMEL TAKLA
File number: WAD 292 of 2010
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 20 July 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to amend statement of claim – particulars
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 16.44(1)
Date of hearing: 28 June 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C Slater
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kott Gunning
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr J Ludlow
Solicitor for the Respondents: Downings Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 292 of 2010
BETWEEN: JOHN STRICKLAND DENNIS
Applicant
AND: CHAMBERS INVESTMENT PLANNERS PTY LTD (ACN 009 294 606)
First Respondent
GEORGE KAMEL TAKLA
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BARKER J DATE OF ORDER: 20 JULY 2012 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant have leave to amend his statement of claim in terms of the minute of proposed further amended statement of claim dated 13 June 2012. 2. The minute of proposed further amended statement of claim dated 13 June 2012 stand as the amended statement of claim and service of it be dispensed with. 3. The applicant pay the respondents costs if any thrown away by reason of the amendment. 4. The respondents pay the applicant's costs of the applicant's interlocutory application for leave to further amend the statement of claim filed 13 June 2012 and in opposition to the demand for further particulars to be taxed if not agreed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate