Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd (No 1) [2012] FCA 784 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd (No 1) [2012] FCA 784
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v EMIRATES AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
File numbers: NSD 363 of 2009 NSD 876 of 2009 NSD 1213 of 2009 NSD 534 of 2010
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 23 July 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discovery – whether discovery of disputed categories should be granted
Date of hearing: 23 July 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate