B J McAdam Pty Limited v Jax Tyres Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 799

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

B J McAdam Pty Limited v Jax Tyres Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 799 Citation: B J McAdam Pty Limited v Jax Tyres Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 799

Parties: B J MCADAM PTY LIMITED ACN 000 288 639, BRUCE JAMES MCADAM, MERIM HOLDINGS PTY LTD ACN 112 224 807 and SHIRLEY MARLENE MCADAM v JAX TYRES PTY LIMITED ACN 009 955 840, JAX FRANCHISING SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED ACN 060 109 891, JAX TYRES INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED ACN 112 266 832, IAN FREDERICK HURRELL, VAKOFA PTY LIMITED ACN 003 318 625, COLNAGOW INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 128 667 532, QUICKFIT TYRE SERVICE PTY LTD ACN 071 116 615, JAX QUICKFIT FRANCHISING SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED ACN 112 050 058, CHYLOS PTY LIMITED ACN 991 402 562, VALNOCK PTY LIMITED ACN 010 596 077 JAX TYRES FINANCE PTY LIMITED ACN 112 213 895, JEFFREY DAVID BOARD, VALEDON HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED and GRAYEN HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED

File number: NSD 402 of 2010

Judge: PERRAM J

Date of judgment: 1 August 2012

Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Interlocutory applications – whether leave should be granted to bring derivative proceedings – whether leave should be granted to amend pleadings – whether defendants should be restrained from acting on resolution of directors – whether injunction should be continued – whether separate questions should be determined – whether security for costs should be ordered – whether subpoena should be set aside – whether costs should be ordered for abandoned application to set aside notice to produce