Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Li v Chief of Army [2012] FCA 808 Citation: Li v Chief of Army [2012] FCA 808
Appeal from: Li v Chief of Army [2012] ADFDAT 1
Parties: TING LI v CHIEF OF ARMY
File number: NSD 541 of 2012
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 1 August 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – whether hearing of appeal should be expedited
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth)
Cases cited: Paul's Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCA 724
Date of hearing: 1 August 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr AW Street SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Wyatts Attorneys
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms S Callan
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 541 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE DEFENCE FORCE DISCIPLINE APPEAL TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: TING LI
Applicant
AND: CHIEF OF ARMY
Respondent
JUDGE: GRIFFITHS J DATE OF ORDER: 1 AUGUST 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The interlocutory application be dismissed. 2. The costs of the interlocutory application be costs in the cause. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 541 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE DEFENCE FORCE DISCIPLINE APPEAL TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate