Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd v Quasar Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 812 Citation: Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd v Quasar Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 812
Parties: ALLIANCE CRATON EXPLORER PTY LTD ACN 095 337 385 v QUASAR RESOURCES PTY LTD ACN 101 227 070 and HEATHGATE RESOURCES PTY LTD ACN 011 018 232
File number: VID 551 of 2010
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 3 August 2012
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 3 July 2012
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: R Keen
Solicitor for the Applicant: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr M Hoffmann QC and Mr T Rice
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr JR Williams and Ms M Quayle
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Freehills
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 551 of 2010
BETWEEN: ALLIANCE CRATON EXPLORER PTY LTD ACN 095 337 385
Applicant
AND: QUASAR RESOURCES PTY LTD ACN 101 227 070
First Respondent
HEATHGATE RESOURCES PTY LTD ACN 011 018 232
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 3 AUGUST 2012 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The costs of the two notices of motion of Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd of 4 February 2011 and 11 February 2011 to date be costs in the cause. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate