Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Warner v Hung, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) (No 3) [2012] FCA 819 Citation: Warner v Hung, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) (No 3) [2012] FCA 819
Parties: ANTHONY JOHN WARNER AND STEVEN KUGEL IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS OF BELLPAC PTY LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 713 017 and BELLPAC PTY LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 713 017 v KEN YUK KEE HUNG, AUSTCORP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) ACN 003 132 090, ALFRED CHI WAI WONG, DANNY KAM YUN AU-YEUNG and SHAN PEI INVESTMENT LIMITED
File number: NSD 34 of 2010
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 6 August 2012
Legislation: Federal Court Rules r 9.07 Judicature Acts 1873-1875 (UK)
Cases cited: Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 Jackson v Goldsmith (1950) 81 CLR 446 News Limited v Australian Rugby Football League Limited (1996) 64 FCR 410 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251 Warner v Hung, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) (No 2) [2011] FCA 1123
Date of hearing: 16 March and 21 May 2012
Date of last submissions: 23 May 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate