Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ensham Resources Pty Limited v AIOI Insurance Company Limited [2012] FCA 822 Citation: Ensham Resources Pty Limited v AIOI Insurance Company Limited [2012] FCA 822
Appeal from: Ensham Resources Pty Limited v AIOI Insurance Company Limited [2012] FCA 70
Parties: ENSHAM RESOURCES PTY LIMITED ACN 011 048 678 v AIOI INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ARBN 096 302 466, MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ARBN 000 525 637, SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE INC ARBN 000 837 801, TOKIO MARINE & NICHIDO FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ARBN 000 438 291 and NISSAY DOWA GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION LIMITED
File number: NSD 1023 of 2012
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 2 August 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for leave to appeal – whether application should be referred to a Full Court
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1A), 25(2)(e), 33(4B)(a)
Cases cited: Australian Equity Investors, an Arizona Limited Partnership v Colliers International (NSW) Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1198 Chan & Naylor Norwest Pty Ltd v CNIP Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1203 Davis v Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia [2010] FCA 518 Generic Health Pty Ltd v Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd [2012] FCA 412 Oswal v Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2011] FCA 536
Date of hearing: 2 August 2012 based on written submissions
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate