Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tan v AWAP SGT 26 Investment Ltd [2012] FCA 835 Citation: Tan v AWAP SGT 26 Investment Ltd [2012] FCA 835
Parties: TAN KAH HOCK (DANIEL), TAN KAH HONG (RICHARD) and DEO SILVER PTE LTD v AWAP SGT 26 INVESTMENT LIMITED, C N (HONG KONG) LIMITED, CHOU LI CHEN and CN 2000 HOLDINGS LIMITED
File number: WAD 180 of 2007
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2012
Date of hearing: 19 July 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Applicant: No appearance
Solicitor for the Applicant: Hotchkin Hanly Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr D Lenhoff
Solicitor for the Respondent: Holborn Lenhoff Massey
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 180 of 2007
BETWEEN: TAN KAH HOCK (DANIEL)
First Applicant
TAN KAH HONG (RICHARD)
Second Applicant
DEO SILVER PTE LTD
Third Applicant
AND: AWAP SGT 26 INVESTMENT LIMITED
First Respondent
C N (HONG KONG) LIMITED
Second Respondent
CHOU LI CHEN
Third Respondent
CN 2000 HOLDINGS LIMITED
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: GILMOUR J DATE OF ORDER: 19 JULY 2012 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondents' costs of the application, fixed on an indemnity basis, in the sum of $2000. NOTE: Entry of orders is dealt with in rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 180 of 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate