Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jewellery Group Pty Limited [2012] FCA 848 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jewellery Group Pty Limited [2012] FCA 848
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v THE JEWELLERY GROUP PTY LIMITED
File number: SAD 57 of 2011
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 16 August 2012
Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct – dual pricing – "strike through price" juxtaposed with "sale price" – "was price" juxtaposed with "now price" – identification of relevant audience – relevant audience comprised customers aware or partially aware of discounting practices and customers unaware of discounting practices – whether representation conveyed that consumers would save an amount being the difference between "strike through price" and "sale price" or "was price" and "now price" – whether "strike through price" or "was price" was merely a representation of historical offer prices – assessment of actual sales at or near "strike through" or "was price" prior to sale period – whether representation false – whether representation misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 6A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53(e) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No 2) 2010 (Cth) sch 7
Cases cited: Ascot Four Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2009) 176 FCR 106 Astrazeneca Pty Limited v GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Limited [2006] FCAFC 22 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Ascot Four Pty Ltd (2008) 250 ALR 467 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prouds Jewellers Pty Ltd (2008) 75 IPR 306 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prouds Jewellers Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 199 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1254 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45 Multigroup Distribution Services Pty Ltd v TNT Australia Pty Ltd (1996) ATPR 41-522 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 2 All ER 421 Phoenix Court Pty Ltd v Melbourne Central Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1101 Puxu Pty Ltd v Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd (1980) 31 ALR 73 Spencer v Harding [1870] LR 5 CP 561 Taco Company of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 Truth about Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Pty Ltd (1998) 42 IPR 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate