Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Aplin on behalf of the Pitta Pitta People v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 883 Citation: Aplin on behalf of the Pitta Pitta People v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 883
Parties: NEVILLE APLIN, CARMEL BELFORD, NOEL DOYLE, JEAN JACKS, FLORENCE MELVILLE AND ALFRED NATHAN ON BEHALF OF THE PITTA PITTA PEOPLE v STATE OF QUEENSLAND, BOULIA SHIRE COUNCIL, CLONCURRY SHIRE COUNCIL, DIAMANTINA SHIRE COUNCIL, WINTON SHIRE COUNCIL, ERGON ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED, IVANHOE (OSBORNE) PTY LTD, ROVERTON PTY LTD and AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED, VIDA FELICIA BEAUCHAMP, REGINALD HASTED BEAUCHAMP, ROSLYN ANN BLACKET, ROBERT STIRLING BLACKET, WILLIAM HENRY CAMERON, KALINDA LOUISE CLUFF, WILLIAM PATRICK CLUFF, GLADYS MAY ELLIOT, JOHN MAXMILLIAN FEGAN, PHILIP GREGORY PRINCE, SCHOLEFIELDS BOULIA PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE JBS TRUST AND JAMES BRITTAIN SCHOLEFIELD, ADRIAN JOSEPH WELLS AND VICKI ANN WELLS
File number: QUD 6025 of 1999
Judge: DOWSETT J
Date of consent determination: 28 August 2012
Place: Boulia
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 39
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr T McAvoy
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr C Reiach of Queensland South Native Title Services
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms K Stride of Crown Law
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate