Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQTG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 895 Citation: SZQTG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 895
Related to: SZQTG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 891
Parties: SZQTG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 712 of 2012
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 21 August 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Determination of fixed costs – whether to grant
Date of hearing: 21 August 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 3
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear
Solicitor for the First Respondent: A Crittenden of Clayton Utz
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 712 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZQTG
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 21 AUGUST 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The costs which the first respondent may recover from the applicant be in the sum of $2,431. 2. Leave be granted to the first respondent to file in Court the affidavit of Ms Bulut sworn 20 August 2012. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate