Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Baranski v Comcare [2012] FCA 925 Citation: Baranski v Comcare [2012] FCA 925
Appeal from: Baranski and Comcare [2012] AATA 115
Parties: MICHAEL BARANSKI v COMCARE
File number: NSD 463 of 2012
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2012
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – revocation of determination to compensate for injury alleged to have been suffered arising out of or in the course of employment – whether error of law in the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 5A, 14, 62, 64 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 33.12
Cases cited: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Australian Telecommunications Corporation v Lambroglou (1990) 12 AAR 515 Avon Downs Proprietary Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353 Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2003) 76 ALD 321 Comcare v Etheridge (2006) 149 FCR 522 Davies v Australian Securities Commission (1995) 131 ALR 295 Dornan v Riordan (1990) 24 FCR 564 HBF Health Funds Inc v Minister for Health and Ageing (2006) 149 FCR 291 Luxton v Vines (1952) 85 CLR 352 McAuliffe v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1992) 28 ALD 609 McDonald v Director-General of Social Security (1984) 1 FCR 354 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 Norton v Comcare (2000) 31 AAR 488 Telstra Corporation Limited v Bowden [2012] FCA 576 TNT Skypak International (Aust) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 82 ALR 175 Waterford v The Commonwealth of Australia (1987) 163 CLR 54
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate