Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Apotex Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 928 Citation: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Apotex Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 928
Parties: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MERCK SHARP & DOHME (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD ACN 000 173 508 v APOTEX PTY LTD ACN 096 916 148
File number: NSD 936 of 2012
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2012
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – patents – application for interlocutory orders restraining patent infringement pending final hearing
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Cephalon, Inc v Orchid Europe Limited [2010] All ER (D) 229; [2010] EWHC 2945 Interpharma Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents (2008) 79 IPR 261; [2008] FCA 1498
Date of hearing: 24 August 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Counsel for the Applicants: Ms K Howard SC and Mr M J Darke
Solicitor for the Applicants: Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B N Caine SC with Mr A J Maryniak and Ms P Arcus
Solicitor for the Respondent: Freehills
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 936 of 2012
BETWEEN: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP
First Applicant
MERCK SHARP & DOHME (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD ACN 000 173 508
Second Applicant
AND: APOTEX PTY LTD ACN 096 916 148
Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 31 AUGUST 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate