Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wilson v Microsoft Corporation [2012] FCA 933 Citation: Wilson v Microsoft Corporation [2012] FCA 933
Parties: ERIC CAMERON WILSON v MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT AUSTRALIA PTY LTD and MICROSOFT US SUBSIDIARY; MICROSOFT PTY LTD; ERIC CAMERON WILSON
File number: VID 98 of 2009
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 27 August 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE– application for further discovery – application for self-executing order in the event of failure to comply with procedural deadline – no self-executing order made as applicant unrepresented – any further failure to comply with orders made may result in proceeding being struck out
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 s 37M
Cases cited: AON Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 referred to
Date of hearing: 27 August 2012
Date of publication of reasons: 31 August 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant/Cross-Respondent: The Applicant was self-represented
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate