Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Trifunovski v ACE Insurance Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 937 Citation: Trifunovski v ACE Insurance Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 937
Parties: BLAGOJA TRIFUNOVSKI v ACE INSURANCE LIMITED SHANE PEREZ v ACE INSURANCE LIMITED RIENZIE PERIES v ACE INSURANCE LIMITED FETIE DICINOSKI v ACE INSURANCE LIMITED WILLIAM DICINOSKI v ACE INSURANCE LIMITED
File numbers: NSD 649 OF 2009 NSD 643 OF 2009 NSD 644 OF 2009 NSD 646 OF 2009 NSD 647 OF 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 28 August 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appeal – application for stay of execution of orders pending appeal – consideration and application of relevant principles
Cases cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (Receivers Appointed) (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 applied TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd v Antoniadis (No 2) (1999) 48 NSWLR 381 cited
Date of hearing: 28 August 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Solicitor for the Applicants: B O'Donnell of KP O'Donnell & Associates
Counsel for the Respondent: A Leopold SC, R Glover
Solicitor for the Respondent: Allens
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 649 OF 2009
BETWEEN: BLAGOJA TRIFUNOVSKI
Applicant
AND: ACE INSURANCE LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate