Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Santhirarajah v Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia [2012] FCA 940 Citation: Santhirarajah v Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia [2012] FCA 940
Parties: THULASITHARAN SANTHIRARAJAH v ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH
File number: VID 216 of 2012
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2012
Date of hearing: 14, 15 and 16 May 2012
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – Respondent determined to surrender applicant to United States under s 22(2) of Extradition Act – whether s 22(2) prescribes a time by which the power to make a determination must be exercised – whether determination made when power had ceased to exist EXTRADITION – Whether respondent erred in forming satisfaction under s 22(3)(a) – Where applicant raised extradition objection – whether offences were political offences – consideration of development of political offence exception – consideration of contemporary meaning of political offence EXTRADITION – Whether respondent erred in forming satisfaction under s 22(3)(b) that applicant would not be subjected to torture on surrender – where respondent misunderstood obligation of US under Art 3(1) of Convention Against Torture Whether respondent's discretion under s 22(3)(f) miscarried – where respondent relied on assurance by US Whether respondent asked wrong question in considering best interests of child Whether applicant denied procedural fairness ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Where respondent approved briefing paper from department – where respondent not obliged to provide reasons for determination – whether inference can be drawn from respondent's approval of briefing paper that respondent adopted its reasoning
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate