Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZRPA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 962 Citation: SZRPA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 962
Appeal from: SZRPA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 91
Parties: SZRPA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and JOHN GODFREY IN HIS CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 369 of 2012
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 4 September 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether an independent merits reviewer appointed under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to review the decision of a departmental officer not to accept an offshore entry person's claims for protection under the Refugees' Convention committed jurisdictional error by not addressing in his recommendations to the Minister the question of whether the Minister should grant to that person a visa pursuant to s 195A of the Migration Act in circumstances where the only ground for the claims made before the reviewer was that the claimant was entitled to protection by reason of the Convention and where that specific claim was addressed and dealt with by the reviewer
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36, 46A, 65, 91S and 195A Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: SZRPA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 91 related NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 cited NAVK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1695 cited Plaintiff M61/2010E v The Commonwealth (2010) 243 CLR 319 cited S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate