Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Transfield ER Futures Limited v The Ship 'Giovanna Iuliano' (No 2) [2012] FCA 967 Citation: Transfield ER Futures Limited v The Ship 'Giovanna Iuliano' (No 2) [2012] FCA 967
Parties: TRANSFIELD ER FUTURES LIMITED v THE SHIP 'GIOVANNA IULIANO' and DEIULEMAR SHIPPING SpA
File number: VID 371 of 2012
Judge: GORDON J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2012
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 3 September 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr AP Trichardt
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Defendant: Mr MNC Harvey
Solicitor for the Second Defendant: Holman Fenwick Willan
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 371 of 2012
BETWEEN: TRANSFIELD ER FUTURES LIMITED
Plaintiff
AND: THE SHIP 'GIOVANNA IULIANO'
First Defendant
DEIULEMAR SHIPPING SpA
Second Defendant
JUDGE: GORDON J DATE OF ORDER: 5 September 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Plaintiff pay the Second Defendant's costs of the Proceeding on a party and party basis, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 371 of 2012
BETWEEN: TRANSFIELD ER FUTURES LIMITED
Plaintiff
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate