Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nazdall Pty Ltd v Herrmann [2012] FCA 994 Citation: Nazdall Pty Ltd v Herrmann [2012] FCA 994
Parties: NAZDALL PTY LTD (ACN 009 649 843) and YOWDALL PTY LTD (ACN 115 340 433) v MURRAY JOHN HERRMANN, CHUN YOW NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 009 601 423) and CHI KUNG NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 081 824 400)
File number: VID 427 of 2012
Judge: MARSHALL J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – change of venue – application to transfer proceeding to the Northern Territory District Registry of the Court – balance of convenience – relevant principles – order made transferring the proceeding – s 48 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 48
Cases cited: National Mutual Holdings Pty Ltd v the Sentry Corporation and Another (1988) 19 FCR 155 Macks v Garrett (2008) 174 FCR 151 Comello Pty Ltd v Feeney [2011] FCA 1334 Quotila Pty Ltd v South Australian Marine Products Industries Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 29 Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd and Quasar Resources Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1415 Gunn Capital Management Pty Ltd v Solamind Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1360 Mortimer v Opus Prime Stockbroking Ltd [2009] FCA 227 Lamb v Hog's Breath Company Pty Ltd (No 1) [2007] FCA 49
Date of hearing: 31 August 2012
Date of last submissions: 31 August 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate