Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rumble v Telstra Corporation Limited [2012] FCA 1006 Citation: Rumble v Telstra Corporation Limited [2012] FCA 1006
Parties: LARRY KEITH RUMBLE v TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED (ACN 051 775 556), SENSIS PTY LTD (ACN 007 423 912) and PHILIP POAT; TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED AND SENSIS PTY LTD (ACN 007 423 912) v PHILIP POAT
File number: ACD 80 of 2011
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 7 September 2012
Date of hearing: 7 September 2012
Place: Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Walker
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr Ian D Stevens
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents/Cross-Claimants: Mr W Sharwood
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents/Cross-Claimants: King & Wood Mallesons
Solicitor for the Third Respondent/Cross-Respondent: The Third Respondent/Cross-Respondent appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 80 of 2011
BETWEEN: LARRY KEITH RUMBLE
Applicant
AND: TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED (ACN 051 775 556)
First Respondent
SENSIS PTY LTD (ACN 007 423 912)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate