Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Murphy v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2012] FCA 1007 Citation: Murphy v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2012] FCA 1007
Parties: LOUISE MURPHY v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141 PAUL SMITH v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141 LUCKY POULOS v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141 WILLIAM LAWSON v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141 STUART MOORE v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141 DANIELLE LAVARS v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141 COREY WITTENBERG v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141
File number(s): NSD 1157 of 2009 NSD 1839 of 2011 NSD 1980 of 2011 NSD 690 of 2010 NSD 384 of 2010 NSD 31 of 2010 NSD 90 of 2010
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2012
Date of hearing: 5 September 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr I Neil SC with Mr D P O'Dowd and Mr Y Shariff
Solicitor for the Applicants: Gillis Delaney Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr N Hutley SC with Mr M J Steele and Ms J Seymour
Solicitor for the Respondent: Allens
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1157 of 2009
BETWEEN: LOUISE MURPHY
Applicant
AND: WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141
Respondent
JUDGE: GRIFFITHS J DATE OF ORDER: 5 SEPTEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate