Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Strategic Financial and Project Services Pty Limited v Bank of China [2012] FCA 1008 Citation: Strategic Financial and Project Services Pty Limited v Bank of China [2012] FCA 1008
Parties: STRATEGIC FINANCIAL AND PROJECT SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 110 336 966 and ENERGREEN WIND SYSTEMS PTY LTD ACN 100 729 842 v BANK OF CHINA LIMITED ARBN 002 979 955 and COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124
File number: NSD 1900 of 2008
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 12 September 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – order that applicants pay first respondent's costs – order entered – successful party subsequently sought lump sum costs order instead of any taxed costs – whether power to make order – whether appropriate to make order PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – release of security for costs – form of order
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 43(3)(a) Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 39.05, 40.02, 40.12
Cases cited: Beach Petroleum v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 applied Bitek Pty Ltd v IConnect Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 506 applied CMA Corporation Limited v McSorley (No 2) [2012] FCA 732 applied Dunstan v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (No 3) [2006] FCA 916 applied Strategic Financial and Project Services Pty Ltd v Bank of China [2012] FCA 445 referred to Strategic Financial and Project Services Pty Ltd v Bank of China [2012] FCA 701 referred to Strategic Financial and Project Services Pty Ltd v Bank of China [2012] FCA 757 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate