Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SMA Solar Technology AG v Beyond Building Systems Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1017 Citation: SMA Solar Technology AG v Beyond Building Systems Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1017
Parties: SMA SOLAR TECHNOLOGY AG and SMA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 127 198 761 v BEYOND BUILDING SYSTEMS PTY LTD ACN 128 030 302 and IPEVO PTY LTD ACN 143 970 978
File number: NSD 817 of 2011
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 17 September 2012
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Admission of evidence – web page poorly printed out – whether discretion in s 135 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) should be used to exclude evidence
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 135
Date of hearing: 17 September 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 2
Counsel for the Applicants: M Darke, H Pintos-Lopez
Solicitor for the Applicants: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for the First Respondent: The first respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Second Respondent: C Amato
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Addisons
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 817 of 2011
BETWEEN: SMA SOLAR TECHNOLOGY AG
First Applicant
SMA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 127 198 761
Second Applicant
AND: BEYOND BUILDING SYSTEMS PTY LTD ACN 128 030 302
First Respondent
IPEVO PTY LTD ACN 143 970 978
Second Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE: 17 SEPTEMBER 2012 PLACE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate