Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Patel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 1020 Citation: Patel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 1020
Appeal from: Patel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship & Anor [2011] FMCA 112
Parties: CHANDRAKANT BHAGABHAI PATEL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 67 of 2011
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 17 September 2012
Corrigendum: 25 October 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by appellant for leave to re-open argument in appeal after judgment reserved – no submissions filed by appellant – whether application abandoned – principles relevant to granting leave to re-open argument – relevance of case to which appellant referred in interlocutory application seeking leave
Cases cited: Davidova v Murphy [2009] FCA 601 cited Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions of the Australian Capital Territory (2003) 214 CLR 318 cited Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Plaintiff M106 of 2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] HCA 32 cited
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate