Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQPA [2012] FCA 1025 Citation: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQPA [2012] FCA 1025
Appeal from: SZQPA v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 123
Parties: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP v SZQPA and RON WITTON IN HIS CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 564 of 2012
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 20 September 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether the Federal Magistrate erred in holding that the Reviewer fell into jurisdictional error in considering the first respondent's claims to fear harm at the hand of Sri Lankan authorities by reason of being suspected of being a supporter of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) – whether the Reviewer asked himself a wrong question in considering the first respondent's claims to fear harm -whether there was an expressly articulated claim before the Reviewer requiring him to consider whether the first respondent would be subjected to persecution during the process of questioning by the Sri Lankan authorities - whether the Reviewer was required to consider whether the process of the questioning of the first respondent upon his arrival to Sri Lanka would expose him to a risk of serious harm
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 46A(7), 91R
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 cited Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth (2010) 243 CLR 319 discussed Politis v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 16 ALD 707 cited Roser v Immigration Review Tribunal (1991) 25 ALD 443 cited SZQPA v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 123 affirmed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate