Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Atieh v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2012] FCA 1027 Citation: Atieh v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2012] FCA 1027
Parties: MUSTAFA ATIEH v CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
File number: WAD 474 of 2011
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 20 September 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for summary judgment under s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether there was a reasonable prospect of prosecuting the proceeding
Legislation: Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 9(1)(a), 9(1)(e), 9A(1), 98(6B) Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (Cth) Part 67 Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PH(1)(c) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A(2) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (Cth) Reg 5.04 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01(1)
Cases cited: Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd (2008) 167 FCR 372 cited Spencer v The Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118 considered
Date of hearing: 7 August 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 47
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P Walker
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ashurst Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 474 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate