Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GDK Financial Solutions Pty Ltd (No 12) [2012] FCA 1035 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GDK Financial Solutions Pty Ltd (No 12) [2012] FCA 1035
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v GDK FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PTY LTD (ACN 085 455 311) (AND OTHERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
File number: VID 590 of 2006
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 19 September 2012
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – unregistered managed investment scheme – authorisation of payment of tax liability from receivership account
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 15 June 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Solicitor for the Mews Receivers: Ashurst
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 590 of 2006
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
Plaintiff
AND: GDK FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PTY LTD (ACN 085 455 311) (AND OTHERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
Defendant
JUDGE: DODDS-STREETON J DATE OF ORDER: 19 SEPTEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Mews Receivers are authorised to draw from the Receivership Account (as defined in paragraph 9(b) of the Orders of the Court dated 13 March 2008) the amount of $272,095.67 on account of income tax owing to the Australian Taxation Office by the Mews Scheme for the financial years ending 30 June 2008, 30 June 2009, 30 June 2010, and 30 June 2011. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate