Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Inkamala v Northern Territory of Australia [2012] FCA 1044 Citation: Inkamala v Northern Territory of Australia [2012] FCA 1044
Parties: CARL INKAMALA, TRUDY INKAMALA, LOFTY KATAKARINJA, PETER MOKETARINJA, AND BAYDON WILLIAMS (ON BEHALF OF THE IMPERLKGNE GROUP, THE URLATHERRKE GROUP, THE PMERKETERENYE GROUP, THE YAPERLPE GROUP, THE LTHALALTWEME GROUP AND THE MERINA GROUP) v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA, HELE PTY LTD and NT GAS PTY LTD
File number: NTD 34 of 2010
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 25 September 2012
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – determination of native title by consent – requirements under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Cases cited: Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 Jungarrayi on behalf of the Mirtartu, Warupunju, Arrawajin and Tijampara Landholding Groups v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 766 Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 Munn (for and on behalf of the Gunggari People) v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 Roberts on behalf of the Najig and the Guyanggan Nganwirdbird Groups v Northern Territory of Australia [2012] FCA 223 Wavehill v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 581
Date of hearing: 25 September 2012
Place: Hermannsburg
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate