Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZRHF v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2012] FCA 1085 Citation: SZRHF v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2012] FCA 1085
Appeal from: SZRHF v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2012] FMCA 595
Parties: SZRHF v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1081 of 2012
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 27 September 2012
Date of hearing: 27 September 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Solicitor for the First Respondent: DLA Piper Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1081 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZRHF
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NICHOLAS J DATE OF ORDER: 27 september 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellant must pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1081 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZRHF
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate