Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bunt v Nati [2012] FCA 1089 Citation: Bunt v Nati [2012] FCA 1089
Parties: GREGORY JOHN BUNT v ROBERT NATI and YING JIA (JASON) DAI
File number: NSD 1633 of 2008
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 6 September 2012
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 601AB(3), 1274B(2) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Cases cited: Kestrel Holdings Pty Limited v APF Properties Pty Limited (2009) 260 ALR 418 Management 3 Group Pty Limited v Lenny's Commercial Kitchens Pty Limited (2012) 289 ALR 275
Date of hearing: 3 – 6 September 2012
Date of last submissions: 12 September 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 97
Counsel for the applicant: M Condon
Solicitor for the applicant: Price & Company
Counsel for the first respondent: B Guzzo
Solicitor for the first respondent: Doherty and Colleagues
Counsel for the second respondent: CM Lawrence
Solicitor for the second respondent: Ren Zhou Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1633 of 2008
BETWEEN: GREGORY JOHN BUNT
Applicant
AND: ROBERT NATI
Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 21 SEPTEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate