Federal Court of Australia
EDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQTS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA] 1094 Citation: SZQTS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA] 1094
Appeal from: SZQTS & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA] 468
Parties: SZQTS, SZQTT and SZQTU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 819 of 2012
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 9 October 2012
Date of hearing: 5 October 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Solicitor for the First, Second and Third Appellants: The Second Appellant appeared in person
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 819 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZQTS
First Appellant
SZQTT
Second Appellant
SZQTU
Third Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J DATE OF ORDER: 5 OCTOBER 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The second appellant be appointed the litigation representative of the first appellant pursuant to Rule 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). 2. The application be dismissed. 3. The second and third appellants pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate