Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v MZYRI [2012] FCA 1107 Citation: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v MZYRI [2012] FCA 1107
Appeal from: MZYRI v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA 396
Parties: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP v MZYRI and W J BLICK, IN HIS CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 607 of 2012
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 16 October 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether independent merits reviewer misunderstood, misconstrued or failed to consider first respondent's claims – "essential and significant" Convention reasons pursuant to s 91R Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as amended by the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees
Cases cited: Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389; [2003] HCA 26 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Sarrazola (1999) 95 FCR 517; [1999] FCA 1134 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2002) 209 CLR 533; [2002] HCA 7 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Rajaratnam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 62 ALD 73; [2000] FCA 1111 SHKB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 545 SZATE v Minister for Immigration [2004] FMCA 532 SZCBT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2007] FCA 9 SZJRI v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship (2008) 103 ALD 176; [2008] FCA 1090 SZQJH v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 297
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate