Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emirates [2012] FCA 1108 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emirates [2012] FCA 1108
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v EMIRATES (ARBN 073 569 696)
File number: NSD 876 of 2009
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 11 October 2012
Catchwords: COMPETITION – price-fixing – collusive understandings – respondent admitted to seven contraventions of s 45(2) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – enforcement and remedies – application for pecuniary penalties and injunctions under ss 76 and 80 – agreed penalties and injunctions – regulator and respondent filed joint submissions, statement of agreed facts and agreed short minutes of order –whether contraventions occurred – whether the proposed penalties should be imposed – whether quantum of proposed penalties in the appropriate range – matters relevant to imposition of penalty – admissions not made until pleadings had closed and most evidence served – parity with penalties imposed in similar cases
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) 45, 45(2)(a)(ii), 45(2)(b)(ii), 45A(1), 76, 77(2), 80 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cargolux Airlines International SA (2009) ATPR ¶42-282 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Korean Air Lines Co Ltd [2011] FCA 1360 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Malaysia Airline System Berhad (No 2) [2012] FCA 767 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v McMahon Services Pty Ltd (2004) ATPR ¶42-031 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc. (1999) 161 ALR 79 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Qantas Airways Ltd (2008) 253 ALR 89 Minister for Industry Tourism & Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd (2004) ¶41–993 J McPhee & Son (Australia) Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2000) 172 ALR 53 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd (1991) ATPR ¶41-076
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate