Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd [2012] FCA 1111 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd [2012] FCA 1111
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v SINGAPORE AIRLINES CARGO PTE LTD (ARBN 095 934 857)
File number: NSD 1980 of 2008
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 11 October 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discovery – application for discovery of agreements between applicant and other international airlines in respect of the subject matter of the proceedings between the applicant and the respondent – whether discovery should be ordered
Cases cited: Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 cited
Date of hearing: 11 October 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant: J Halley SC, CG Arnott
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: S Free
Solicitor for the Respondent: Minter Ellison
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1980 of 2008
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
Applicant
AND: SINGAPORE AIRLINES CARGO PTE LTD (ARBN 095 934 857)
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 11 OCTOBER 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant give discovery to the respondent by 9 November 2012 of all documents recording an agreement or undertaking given to the applicant by any international airline, or any past or present employee of any international airline, to cooperate with or assist the applicant by giving evidence, or making witnesses available to give evidence (or seeking to make such witnesses available), in any proceedings brought by the application in respect of the subject matter of this proceeding. 2. Costs be costs in the cause. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate