Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pratt Holdings Proprietary Limited v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2012] FCA 1118 Citation: Pratt Holdings Proprietary Limited v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2012] FCA 1118
Parties: PRATT HOLDINGS PROPRIETARY LIMITED (ACN 004 421 961) v THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: VID 1425 of 2011
Judge: GORDON J
Date of judgment: 16 October 2012
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 12 October 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
Solicitor for the Applicant: Deloitte Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1425 of 2011
BETWEEN: PRATT HOLDINGS PROPRIETARY LIMITED (ACN 004 421 961)
Applicant
AND: THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE: GORDON J DATE OF ORDER: 16 OCTOBER 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Applicant's appeal is dismissed. 2. The Applicant should pay the Respondent's costs of the proceeding, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1425 of 2011
BETWEEN: PRATT HOLDINGS PROPRIETARY LIMITED (ACN 004 421 961)
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate