Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Camm v Linke Nominees Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1133 Citation: Camm v Linke Nominees Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1133
Parties: THE TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF GARY STIRLING CAMM, A BANKRUPT v LINKE NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 005 860 944)
File number: VID 828 of 2009
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 10 October 2012
Publication of reasons: 12 October 2012
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Admissibility of evidence – s 138 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether documents obtained as result of impropriety – unnecessary to rule on documents available to applicant through other sources – rulings on objections to remaining documents deferred
Legislation: Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 138
Cases cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 – referred to Parker v Comptroller–General of Customs (2009) 252 ALR 619 – applied
Dates of hearing: 9 & 10 October 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr I Jones SC, Mr J Ribbands and Mr P Baume
Solicitor for the Applicant: Maitland Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Amerena
Solicitor for the Respondent: Broadley Rees Hogan
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 828 of 2009
BETWEEN: THE TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF GARY STIRLING CAMM, A BANKRUPT
Applicant
AND: LINKE NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 005 860 944)
Respondent
JUDGE: TRACEY J DATE OF ORDER: 10 OCTOBER 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate