Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Bollands (No 2) [2012] FCA 1148 Citation: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Bollands (No 2) [2012] FCA 1148
Parties: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v DAVID BOLLANDS, JOCELYN BOLLANDS, JODACORP PTY LTD (ACN 115 023 900), RESIDENCE RIVERSIDE PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE OF THE D & J DISCRETIONARY TRUST AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE D & J INVESTMENT TRUST (ACN 155 903 209), REGISTRAR OF TITLES and NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED (ACN 004 044 937)
File number: WAD 101 of 2012
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 19 October 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – settling final form of orders after first respondent successfully sought variations to freezing orders to meet reasonable legal expenses – whether self-certification regime imposed on the first respondent's solicitors requires a discrete break-down of legal costs for each related legal proceeding – whether the benefit of a more detailed self-certification regime outweighs the administrative burden imposed on the first respondent
Cases cited: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Bollands [2012] FCA 1050
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 10 October 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate