Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
O'Donoghue v Australian Information Commissioner (No 2) [2012] FCA 1152 Citation: O'Donoghue v Australian Information Commissioner (No 2) [2012] FCA 1152
Parties: VINCENT THOMAS O'DONOGHUE v AUSTRALIAN INFORMATION COMMISSIONER and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: WAD 183 of 2012
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 18 October 2012
Date of hearing: 18 October 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondents: Ms A Ladhams
Solicitor for the First Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Second Respondents: Mr A Gerrard
Solicitor for the Second Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 183 of 2012
BETWEEN: VINCENT THOMAS O'DONOGHUE
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: GILMOUR J DATE OF ORDER: 18 OCTOBER 2012 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The oral application for an adjournment be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the second respondent's costs of the application, to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 183 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate