Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sensaslim Australia Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (No 4) [2012] FCA 1171 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sensaslim Australia Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (No 4) [2012] FCA 1171
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v SENSASLIM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 140 333 133, PETER CLARENCE FOSTER, PETER LESLIE O'BRIEN, ADAM TROY ADAMS and MICHAEL ANTHONY BOYLE
File number: NSD 1163 of 2011
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 26 October 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to file submissions and to tender evidence after judgment reserved – where applicant for leave did not participate in the hearing
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sensaslim Australia Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (No 3) [2012] FCA 939 Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Limited (No 1) (1981) 147 CLR 246 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions of the Australian Capital Territory (2003) 214 CLR 318 Foster v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCA 953 NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power and Water Authority (2004) 219 CLR 90
Date of hearing: 24 October 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate